Matrox QID PRO vs Radeon Instinct MI100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCDNA 1.0 (2020)MP (2004)
GPU code nameArcturusMP-A4
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 November 2020 (3 years ago)17 December 2004 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1502 MHzno data
Number of transistors50,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate721.02.000
Floating-point processing power23.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs4808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI-X
Length267 mm191 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A8.1
Shader ModelN/Ano data
OpenGLN/A1.5
OpenCL2.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2020 17 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB

Instinct MI100 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Instinct MI100 and Matrox QID PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Instinct MI100 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox QID PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
Radeon Instinct MI100
Matrox QID PRO
QID PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.