Radeon E9172 MXM vs ATI IGP 350M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1495not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRS200Lexa
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)3 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed183 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistors30 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.3739.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 3 October 2017
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

E9172 MXM has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 350M and Radeon E9172 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
Radeon E9172 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 9 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9172 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.