ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP vs ATI IGP 345M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1530not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameRS200RS480
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 October 2002 (22 years ago)8 November 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed183 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors30 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm110 nm
Texture fill rate0.371.200
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.09.0
OpenGL1.42.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2002 8 November 2004
Chip lithography 180 nm 110 nm

ATI Xpress 200 IGP has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon IGP 345M and Radeon Xpress 200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon IGP 345M is a notebook card while Radeon Xpress 200 IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Radeon IGP 345M
ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 200 IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.