Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs HD 8970M Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire with Radeon RX 580 2048SP, including specs and performance data.

HD 8970M Crossfire
2012
200 Watt
18.63

RX 580 2048SP outperforms HD 8970M Crossfire by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking297276
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Power efficiency6.399.11
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNeptune CFPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)15 October 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed850 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1284 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data164.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.259 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−2.2%
95−100
+2.2%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−2.2%
95−100
+2.2%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Hitman 3 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−2.2%
95−100
+2.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4.8%
110−120
+4.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−2%
100−105
+2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and RX 580 2048SP compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 2048SP is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.63 19.93
Recency 1 May 2012 15 October 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 150 Watt

RX 580 2048SP has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and Radeon RX 580 2048SP.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3166 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.