GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking295not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNeptune CFG96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256032
Core clock speed850 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 40 Watt

HD 8970M Crossfire has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GS Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is a notebook card while GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.