Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8790M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8790M with Quadro T1000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 8790M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
3.39

T1000 Mobile outperforms HD 8790M by a whopping 401% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking733321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.27
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMarsTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed850 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown50 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6069.84
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS2.235 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8790M 3.39
T1000 Mobile 16.98
+401%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8790M 1305
T1000 Mobile 6540
+401%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8790M 2187
T1000 Mobile 11377
+420%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8790M 9835
T1000 Mobile 31509
+220%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8790M 1727
T1000 Mobile 8727
+405%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8790M 12049
T1000 Mobile 53629
+345%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−130%
62
+130%
4K9−10
−433%
48
+433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−380%
48
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−563%
53
+563%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−600%
49
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−526%
119
+526%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1560%
83
+1560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−110%
80−85
+110%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−486%
41
+486%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−500%
114
+500%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1160%
63
+1160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−550%
52
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−110%
80−85
+110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−190%
29
+190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−300%
32
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−343%
31
+343%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−468%
100−110
+468%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−133%
35
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−110%
80−85
+110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−525%
50
+525%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 90−95
Hitman 3 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−386%
100−110
+386%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how HD 8790M and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is 130% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Mobile is 433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.39 16.98
Recency 1 April 2013 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T1000 Mobile has a 400.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8790M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8790M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon HD 8790M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 337 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8790M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 154 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.