GeForce RTX 4090 vs Radeon HD 8770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8770M with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

HD 8770M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
2.99

RTX 4090 outperforms HD 8770M by a whopping 3244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7741
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.81
Power efficiencyno data15.36
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMarsAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416384
Core clock speed775 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors950 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data450 Watt
Texture fill rate19.801,290
Floating-point processing power0.6336 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs24512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8770M 2.99
RTX 4090 100.00
+3244%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8770M 1934
RTX 4090 104598
+5308%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8770M 8530
RTX 4090 137609
+1513%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
−394%
267
+394%
1440p6−7
−3300%
204
+3300%
4K4−5
−3600%
148
+3600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.99
1440pno data7.84
4Kno data10.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−3650%
225
+3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−2511%
235
+2511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−28600%
287
+28600%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−4780%
240−250
+4780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−3600%
222
+3600%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1719%
290−300
+1719%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1513%
120−130
+1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1500%
350−400
+1500%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5067%
150−160
+5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−3750%
450−500
+3750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−2156%
200−210
+2156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−24700%
248
+24700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−4780%
240−250
+4780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−3467%
214
+3467%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1719%
290−300
+1719%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1513%
120−130
+1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1500%
350−400
+1500%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5067%
150−160
+5067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−4467%
548
+4467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1621%
240−250
+1621%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1889%
179
+1889%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−21900%
220
+21900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−3400%
210
+3400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1719%
290−300
+1719%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1513%
120−130
+1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1691%
394
+1691%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−4408%
541
+4408%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−2079%
305
+2079%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−292%
153
+292%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1671%
120−130
+1671%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3220%
160−170
+3220%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2700%
110−120
+2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5067%
155
+5067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2700%
80−85
+2700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1625%
130−140
+1625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4750%
388
+4750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−13300%
268
+13300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1233%
240−250
+1233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3350%
65−70
+3350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−5900%
120
+5900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−11900%
120
+11900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 250−260
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−11600%
117
+11600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2675%
110−120
+2675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 504
+0%
504
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 281
+0%
281
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 282
+0%
282
+0%

This is how HD 8770M and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 394% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 3300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 3600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4090 is 28600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.99 100.00
Recency 1 April 2013 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4090 has a 3244.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8770M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8770M
Radeon HD 8770M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14244 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.