Radeon Pro 580 vs HD 8750M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8750M with Radeon Pro 580, including specs and performance data.

HD 8750M
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.60

Pro 580 outperforms HD 8750M by a whopping 673% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking812270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.67
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameMarsPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date26 February 2013 (11 years ago)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842304
Core clock speed670 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors950 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate16.08172.8
Floating-point processing power0.5146 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)2.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8750M 2.60
Pro 580 20.09
+673%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8750M 1004
Pro 580 7753
+672%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−639%
170−180
+639%
Full HD20
−650%
150−160
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Hitman 3 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−663%
290−300
+663%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Hitman 3 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−663%
290−300
+663%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Hitman 3 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−663%
290−300
+663%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

This is how HD 8750M and Pro 580 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 580 is 639% faster in 900p
  • Pro 580 is 650% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 20.09
Recency 26 February 2013 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Pro 580 has a 672.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8750M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8750M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 204 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.