Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs Radeon HD 8670D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1010not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.96no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameDevastatorGV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (11 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed844 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80489.6
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared876 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data897.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

HD 8670D has 150% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop card while Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Radeon HD 8670D
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 60 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.