Tesla K10 vs Radeon HD 8650G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1019not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.66no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed533 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate17.2895.36
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs24128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 1 May 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

HD 8650G has an age advantage of 1 year, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla K10, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G and Tesla K10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650G is a notebook card while Tesla K10 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Radeon HD 8650G
NVIDIA Tesla K10
Tesla K10

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 69 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate Tesla K10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.