ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs HD 8650G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1011not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.80no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameDevastatorRV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)11 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed533 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate17.2819.20
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 11 February 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 8650G has an age advantage of 3 years, a 71.9% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650G and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Radeon HD 8650G
ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 68 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.