GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Radeon HD 8550M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 8550M with GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3050 OEM outperforms HD 8550M by a whopping 1962% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 986 | 186 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.45 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | Sun | GA106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 1755 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | 12,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 130 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 17.00 | 140.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.544 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 20 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 242 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−1900%
|
240−250
+1900%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−1775%
|
300−310
+1775%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| World of Tanks | 30−35
−1835%
|
600−650
+1835%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−1900%
|
240−250
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−1775%
|
300−310
+1775%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1900%
|
180−190
+1900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 9−10
−1900%
|
180−190
+1900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1900%
|
60−65
+1900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−1900%
|
140−150
+1900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1775%
|
300−310
+1775%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1900%
|
300−310
+1900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−1900%
|
300−310
+1900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1900%
|
40−45
+1900%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1775%
|
300−310
+1775%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.49 | 30.73 |
| Recency | 13 July 2014 | 4 January 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
RTX 3050 OEM has a 1962.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8550M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8550M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
