Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics

Place in the ranking	803	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	23.83
Architecture	no data	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	no data	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 August 2013 (11 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	720 / 825 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	114.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 2.75

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+655%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics 2353

T2000 Mobile 13524
+475%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1220%	65−70 +1220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −843%	65−70 +843%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −577%	85−90 +577%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1300%	55−60 +1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −843%	65−70 +843%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Dota 2	7−8 −943%	70−75 +943%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1220%	65−70 +1220%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −325%	65−70 +325%
Fortnite	14−16 −627%	100−110 +627%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −577%	85−90 +577%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −943%	70−75 +943%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1300%	55−60 +1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −452%	130−140 +452%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −560%	65−70 +560%
World of Tanks	50−55 −372%	230−240 +372%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −843%	65−70 +843%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Dota 2	7−8 −943%	70−75 +943%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −325%	65−70 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −577%	85−90 +577%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −452%	130−140 +452%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	30−35
Elden Ring	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −805%	170−180 +805%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
World of Tanks	18−20 −637%	140−150 +637%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −625%	27−30 +625%
Valorant	9−10 −500%	50−55 +500%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −675%	60−65 +675%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Fortnite	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
Valorant	3−4 −733%	24−27 +733%