UHD Graphics 770 vs Radeon HD 8510G

Place in performance ranking	1127	576
Place by popularity	not in top-100	24
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Alder Lake (2022)
GPU code name	Trinity	Alder Lake xG
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 May 2013 (11 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	32
Core clock speed	450 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	554 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.28	26.40
Floating-point performance	0.553 gflops	0.8448 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	1550 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8510G 0.93

UHD Graphics 770 6.15
+561%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8510G 357

UHD Graphics 770 1016
+185%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −850%	19 +850%
4K	2−3 −600%	14 +600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−300%

12
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	14−16
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Hitman 3	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −208%	35−40 +208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	14−16
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Hitman 3	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −208%	35−40 +208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −157%	18 +157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	0−1	14−16
Hitman 3	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −129%	16 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +11.1%	9 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1600%

16−18
+1600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	12−14
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −1200%	35−40 +1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−267%

10−12
+267%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4−5

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	0−1	3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−200%

6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 +0%	13 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how HD 8510G and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 770 is 850% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 770 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8510G is 11% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8510G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 36 tests (59%)
there's a draw in 24 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.93	6.15
Recency	23 May 2013	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 561.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8510G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8510G is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.