HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon HD 8510G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8510G and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8510G
2013
35 Watt
0.95

HD Graphics 400 outperforms HD 8510G by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11221080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8712.96
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameDevastatorBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed554 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate17.287.200
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
World of Tanks 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
World of Tanks 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 1.13
Recency 23 May 2013 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 18.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8510G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8510G
Radeon HD 8510G
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8510G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 418 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.