ATI FirePro M5725 vs Radeon HD 8470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.04no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameScrapperM96
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2013 (11 years ago)9 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192320
Core clock speed800 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate10.2021.60
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2013 9 January 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8470D has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI M5725, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8470D and FirePro M5725. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop card while FirePro M5725 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Radeon HD 8470D
ATI FirePro M5725
FirePro M5725

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 121 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro M5725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.