GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 8470 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.36
Power efficiencyno data2.04
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCaicosGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601536
Core clock speed775 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors370 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate6.20095.36
Floating-point processing power0.248 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2013 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

HD 8470 OEM has 542.9% lower power consumption.

GRID K240Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8470 OEM and GRID K240Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8470 OEM is a desktop card while GRID K240Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
Radeon HD 8470 OEM
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GRID K240Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8470 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.