Radeon 880M vs HD 8410G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8410G and Radeon 880M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8410G
2013
35 Watt
1.13

880M outperforms HD 8410G by a whopping 1691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1079270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2292.80
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameScrapperStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.64092.80
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1232
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8410G 1.13
Radeon 880M 20.24
+1691%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8410G 435
Radeon 880M 7800
+1693%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%
1440p1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−1619%
550−600
+1619%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 8410G and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 880M is 3300% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 880M is 2200% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 8410G is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 8410G is ahead in 21 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 20.24
Recency 23 May 2013 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 1691.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8410G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8410G
Radeon HD 8410G
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 8410G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.