GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Radeon HD 8330

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8330 and GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 8330
2013
15 Watt
0.69

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms HD 8330 by a whopping 2451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174309
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.95
Power efficiency3.1513.40
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKalindiGA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 August 2013 (11 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282048
Core clock speed497 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1740 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976111.4
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8330 0.69
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.60
+2451%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8330 266
RTX 3050 4 GB 6780
+2449%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−2400%
250−260
+2400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2445%
280−290
+2445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

This is how HD 8330 and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 2400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 17.60
Recency 13 August 2013 27 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 90 Watt

HD 8330 has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 2450.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8330 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8330
Radeon HD 8330
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 178 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2592 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.