UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs Radeon HD 8310G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.65
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateJuly 2013 (11 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12824
Core clock speed554 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760no data
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8310G and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8310G is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8310G
Radeon HD 8310G
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.