H100 PCIe vs Radeon HD 8250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameKalindiGH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287296
Core clock speed300 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200752.4
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS24.08 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs8456
Tensor Coresno data456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared80 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,280 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 350 Watt

HD 8250 has 4275% lower power consumption.

H100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8250 and H100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8250 is a notebook card while H100 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 8250
Radeon HD 8250
NVIDIA H100 PCIe
H100 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 71 vote

Rate H100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.