GeForce4 MX 440-8x vs Radeon HD 7950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking399not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.41no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTahitiNV18 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date31 January 2012 (12 years ago)25 September 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Compute units28no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Wattno data
Texture fill rate89.601.100
Floating-point performance2.867 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth240 GB/s2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
ZeroCore+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 118.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2012 25 September 2002
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

HD 7950 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 and GeForce4 MX 440-8x. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950
Radeon HD 7950
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-8x
GeForce4 MX 440-8x

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 406 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 48 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 440-8x on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.