GeForce 720A vs Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated972
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.28
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTahitiGF117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed800 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speedno data938 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate89.6015.01
Floating-point processing power2.867 TFLOPS0.1801 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 March 2013 1 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 33 Watt

HD 7950 Mac Edition has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 720A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 506.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and GeForce 720A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop card while GeForce 720A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition or GeForce 720A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.