GeForce GTX 590 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7870 XT and GeForce GTX 590, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 7870 XT outperforms GTX 590 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 423 | 504 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.59 | 0.78 |
Power efficiency | 4.33 | 1.64 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Tahiti | GF110 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 19 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 24 March 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $270 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
HD 7870 XT has 360% better value for money than GTX 590.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 1024 ×2 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 365 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 97 °C |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 38.91 ×2 |
Floating-point processing power | 2.995 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 |
ROPs | 32 | 48 ×2 |
TMUs | 96 | 64 ×2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | no data | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 279 mm |
Height | no data | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) ×2 |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2 |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 327.7 GB/s ×2 |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 60−65
+27.7%
| 47
−27.7%
|
Full HD | 140−150
+26.1%
| 111
−26.1%
|
1200p | 140−150
+25%
| 112
−25%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 1.93
+227%
| 6.30
−227%
|
- HD 7870 XT has 227% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Fortnite | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Fortnite | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
This is how HD 7870 XT and GTX 590 compete in popular games:
- HD 7870 XT is 28% faster in 900p
- HD 7870 XT is 26% faster in 1080p
- HD 7870 XT is 25% faster in 1200p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 11.48 | 8.58 |
Recency | 19 November 2012 | 24 March 2011 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 365 Watt |
HD 7870 XT has a 33.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 97.3% lower power consumption.
GTX 590, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Radeon HD 7870 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.