GeForce MX110 vs Radeon HD 7750M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7750M and GeForce MX110, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7750M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 28 Watt
3.09

MX110 outperforms HD 7750M by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.578.48
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameChelseaGM108S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (12 years ago)17 November 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512256
Core clock speed575 MHz978 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1006 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,020 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4016.10
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS0.5151 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.16.7 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7750M 3.09
GeForce MX110 3.71
+20.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7750M 1191
GeForce MX110 1431
+20.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7750M 2085
GeForce MX110 2121
+1.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−62.5%
13
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−29.4%
21−24
+29.4%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13%
24−27
+13%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+180%
5
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.7%
40−45
+7.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

This is how HD 7750M and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 21% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7750M is 180% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 225% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7750M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GeForce MX110 is ahead in 53 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 3.71
Recency 24 April 2012 17 November 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

HD 7750M has 7.1% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX110, on the other hand, has a 20.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7750M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Radeon HD 7750M
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2280 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.