L4 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.71
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameWhistlerAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2012 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4807424
Core clock speed725 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors716 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt72 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40489.6
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data169 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s300.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 72 Watt

HD 7690M XT Rebrand has 188% lower power consumption.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand and L4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand is a notebook card while L4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand
Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand
NVIDIA L4
L4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7690M XT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 32 votes

Rate L4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.