ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP vs HD 7660G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1038	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.44	no data
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code name	Devastator	RS400
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	686 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	686 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,303 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	16.46	0.6
Floating-point processing power	0.5268 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	2
TMUs	24	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	IGP	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

32 nm

130 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---