Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon HD 7660G

Place in the ranking	1048	651
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.42	21.63
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	Devastator	Ice Lake GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	686 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	686 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.46	32.00
Floating-point processing power	0.5268 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	no data
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660G 1.23

Iris Plus Graphics 4.72
+284%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7660G 473

Iris Plus Graphics 1814
+284%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	11 −264%	40−45 +264%
Full HD	15 −267%	55−60 +267%
1200p	9 −233%	30−35 +233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Elden Ring	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Dota 2	5 −260%	18−20 +260%
Elden Ring	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	9 −233%	30−33 +233%
Fortnite	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	11 −264%	40−45 +264%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
World of Tanks	39 −259%	140−150 +259%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Dota 2	15 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −275%	120−130 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Valorant	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%