Arc A310 vs Radeon HD 7660G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G and Arc A310, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7660G
2012
35 Watt
1.23

Arc A310 outperforms HD 7660G by a whopping 1057% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1039363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5413.69
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameDevastatorDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed686 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate16.4664.00
Floating-point processing power0.5268 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data124.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660G 1.23
Arc A310 14.23
+1057%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7660G 476
Arc A310 5492
+1054%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7660G 4523
Arc A310 46839
+936%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7660G 1057
Arc A310 11915
+1027%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7660G 6409
Arc A310 53244
+731%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p11
−991%
120−130
+991%
Full HD15
−153%
38
+153%
1200p9
−1011%
100−110
+1011%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5550%
110−120
+5550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−638%
55−60
+638%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−161%
85−90
+161%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5550%
110−120
+5550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−713%
65
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−273%
40−45
+273%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−161%
85−90
+161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5550%
110−120
+5550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−575%
54
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−164%
29
+164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−161%
85−90
+161%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 20−22
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 20−22
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−1700%
100−110
+1700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 12−14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 9−10
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how HD 7660G and Arc A310 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A310 is 991% faster in 900p
  • Arc A310 is 153% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A310 is 1011% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A310 is 5550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A310 is ahead in 42 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 14.23
Recency 15 May 2012 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7660G has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has a 1056.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Radeon HD 7660G
Intel Arc A310
Arc A310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 131 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7660G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 244 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.