Radeon R9 360 OEM vs HD 7640G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1051not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.35no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteTobago
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed496 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate10.9650.40
Floating-point processing power0.3507 TFLOPS1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1625 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data104.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

HD 7640G has 142.9% lower power consumption.

R9 360 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7640G and Radeon R9 360 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Radeon HD 7640G
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 165 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 2084 votes

Rate Radeon R9 360 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.