Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon HD 7610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7610M with Quadro RTX 8000, including specs and performance data.

HD 7610M
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 20 Watt
1.64

RTX 8000 outperforms HD 7610M by a whopping 2951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.90
Power efficiency5.6213.19
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameWhistlerTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4004608
Core clock speed450 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors716 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000509.8
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7610M 1.64
RTX 8000 50.03
+2951%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7610M 632
RTX 8000 19278
+2950%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−2592%
350−400
+2592%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data28.57

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2841%
1000−1050
+2841%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2841%
1000−1050
+2841%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2841%
1000−1050
+2841%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

This is how HD 7610M and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 2592% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 50.03
Recency 7 January 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 260 Watt

HD 7610M has 1200% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 2950.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7610M is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon HD 7610M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.