GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 7570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking956not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTurksGK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years ago)13 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480960
Core clock speed650 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1032 MHz
Number of transistors716 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6082.56
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS1.981 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs2480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s144.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2012 13 September 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 140 Watt

HD 7570 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 660 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7570 and GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7570
Radeon HD 7570
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 361 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.