GeForce 9100 vs Radeon HD 7560D
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7560D and GeForce 9100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 7560D outperforms 9100 by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1072 | 1395 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.26 | 0.37 |
Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
GPU code name | Devastator Lite | C78 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 17 April 2007 (17 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $101 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 16 |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 500 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 210 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 80 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 12.16 | 4.000 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.3891 TFLOPS | 0.0384 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 4 |
TMUs | 16 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | IGP | PCI |
Width | IGP | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 17
+467%
| 3−4
−467%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 5.94 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
ELDEN RING | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
ELDEN RING | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Fortnite | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+700%
|
2−3
−700%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Valorant | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
4K
High Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ELDEN RING | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
This is how HD 7560D and GeForce 9100 compete in popular games:
- HD 7560D is 467% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.18 | 0.21 |
Recency | 2 October 2012 | 17 April 2007 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 80 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
HD 7560D has a 461.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
GeForce 9100, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 7560D is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.