Radeon Vega 7 Mobile vs HD 7550M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1046not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.96no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameThamesCezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480448
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors716 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0053.20
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 45 Watt

HD 7550M has 221.4% lower power consumption.

Vega 7 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7550M and Radeon Vega 7 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7550M is a notebook card while Radeon Vega 7 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7550M
Radeon HD 7550M
AMD Radeon Vega 7 Mobile
Radeon Vega 7 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 17 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 51 vote

Rate Radeon Vega 7 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.