ATI Radeon IGP 340 vs HD 7520G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1143not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.61no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameScrapperRS200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed496 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.2200.37
Floating-point processing power0.263 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm

HD 7520G has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7520G and Radeon IGP 340. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G is a notebook card while Radeon IGP 340 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 7520G
ATI Radeon IGP 340
Radeon IGP 340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 95 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.