Radeon RX 6950 XT vs HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics with Radeon RX 6950 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
2012
1.19

RX 6950 XT outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 6036% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.15
Power efficiencyno data14.94
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7365120
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2324 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data335 Watt
Texture fill rateno data743.7
Floating-point processing powerno data23.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 1.19
RX 6950 XT 73.02
+6036%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 2975
RX 6950 XT 119918
+3931%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−7233%
220
+7233%
1440p2−3
−6600%
134
+6600%
4K1−2
−8200%
83
+8200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.00
1440pno data8.20
4Kno data13.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5267%
161
+5267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−5933%
180−190
+5933%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12000%
240−250
+12000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1786%
260−270
+1786%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3813%
300−350
+3813%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−378%
150−160
+378%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−5933%
180−190
+5933%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12000%
240−250
+12000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1786%
260−270
+1786%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−5425%
442
+5425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1345%
150−160
+1345%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−378%
150−160
+378%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3967%
122
+3967%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11600%
110−120
+11600%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12000%
240−250
+12000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2171%
318
+2171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4850%
396
+4850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1864%
216
+1864%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−234%
107
+234%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16500%
160−170
+16500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8600%
85−90
+8600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1429%
100−110
+1429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−6275%
255
+6275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 130−140
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2850%
110−120
+2850%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−5800%
55−60
+5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 132
+0%
132
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 294
+0%
294
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+0%
144
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 172
+0%
172
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
+0%
65
+0%

This is how HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 7233% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 6600% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 8200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 16500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 73.02
Recency 15 May 2012 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm

RX 6950 XT has a 6036.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G HD 7550M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2724 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.