Radeon Pro W6600 vs HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics with Radeon Pro W6600, including specs and performance data.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
2012
1.19

Pro W6600 outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 3282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1056104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.27
Power efficiencyno data27.59
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7361792
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2903 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data325.1
Floating-point processing powerno data10.4 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3114%
450−500
+3114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3181%
1050−1100
+3181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3114%
450−500
+3114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3181%
1050−1100
+3181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3114%
450−500
+3114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3181%
1050−1100
+3181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 40.25
Recency 15 May 2012 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600 has a 3282.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon Pro W6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G HD 7550M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.