GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics with GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
2012
1.19

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 4365% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105649
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.03
Power efficiencyno data18.20
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7364864
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data253.1
Floating-point processing powerno data16.2 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 1.19
RTX 3060 Ti 53.13
+4365%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics 2975
RTX 3060 Ti 78597
+2542%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−4600%
141
+4600%
1440p1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.83
1440pno data5.12
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1917%
121
+1917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4200%
120−130
+4200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2513%
200−210
+2513%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−350%
140−150
+350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3167%
196
+3167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2500%
78
+2500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4200%
120−130
+4200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2300%
192
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−350%
140−150
+350%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1150%
75
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2467%
77
+2467%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−8550%
173
+8550%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−900%
140
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2075%
174
+2075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−736%
92
+736%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−141%
77
+141%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6400%
65
+6400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5100%
52
+5100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−957%
70−75
+957%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2750%
114
+2750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 85−90
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−4017%
247
+4017%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 45−50

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 35−40
Far Cry 5 0−1 30−35

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95
+0%
95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+0%
74
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139
+0%
139
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 57
+0%
57
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+0%
77
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

This is how HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 4600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 7700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 10900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 53.13
Recency 15 May 2012 1 December 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm

RTX 3060 Ti has a 4364.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G HD 7550M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15531 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.