GeForce PCX 5950 vs Radeon HD 7420G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTrinityNV38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)17 February 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed480 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt57 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2403.800
Floating-point performance0.1677 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data850 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data27.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 17 February 2004
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 57 Watt

HD 7420G has an age advantage of 8 years, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 62.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7420G and GeForce PCX 5950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7420G is a notebook card while GeForce PCX 5950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Radeon HD 7420G
NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5950
GeForce PCX 5950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 31 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7420G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.