Radeon RX 580 XTR vs HD 7400G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1166not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameScrapperPolaris 20
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed327 MHz1257 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz1340 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate5.088193.0
Floating-point processing power0.1628 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs12144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 185 Watt

HD 7400G has 988.2% lower power consumption.

RX 580 XTR, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and Radeon RX 580 XTR. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Radeon HD 7400G
AMD Radeon RX 580 XTR
Radeon RX 580 XTR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 89 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 XTR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.