GeForce GT 635 OEM vs Radeon HD 7400G
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1178 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | Trinity | GK208 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 October 2013 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 327 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 423 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.088 | 30.94 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.1628 gflops | 0.7427 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 3.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2012 | 1 October 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
HD 7400G has 105.9% lower power consumption.
GT 635 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7400G and GeForce GT 635 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7400G is a notebook card while GeForce GT 635 OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
