Quadro P500 vs Radeon HD 7340

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7340 with Quadro P500, including specs and performance data.

HD 7340
2012
18 Watt
0.40

P500 outperforms HD 7340 by a whopping 955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1255681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5516.35
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameLovelandGP108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)5 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$552.69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed523 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHz1518 MHz
Number of transistors450 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate4.18424.29
Floating-point processing power0.08368 TFLOPS0.7772 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7340 0.40
Quadro P500 4.22
+955%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7340 153
Quadro P500 1628
+964%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7340 332
Quadro P500 3022
+812%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7340 224
Quadro P500 2255
+906%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7340 1908
Quadro P500 12868
+574%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p552.69no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Hitman 3 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 7340 and Quadro P500 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P500 is 1800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7340 is 13% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P500 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7340 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Quadro P500 is ahead in 28 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 4.22
Recency 6 June 2012 5 January 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

Quadro P500 has a 955% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7340 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop card while Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7340
Radeon HD 7340
NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 66 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 29 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.