GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon HD 6990M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6990M with GeForce RTX 2060, including specs and performance data.

HD 6990M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.25

RTX 2060 outperforms HD 6990M by a whopping 599% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking614129
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data40.82
Power efficiency3.6615.99
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBlackcombTU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 July 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11201920
Core clock speed715 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate40.04201.6
Floating-point processing power1.602 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs56120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6990M 5.25
RTX 2060 36.68
+599%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6990M 3227
RTX 2060 27163
+742%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6990M 15113
RTX 2060 60454
+300%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p54
−548%
350−400
+548%
Full HD60
−96.7%
118
+96.7%
1440p10−12
−620%
72
+620%
4K7−8
−600%
49
+600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data4.85
4Kno data7.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−557%
92
+557%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1217%
79
+1217%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1021%
157
+1021%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−864%
106
+864%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−936%
114
+936%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−753%
128
+753%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−521%
205
+521%
Hitman 3 10−12
−791%
98
+791%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−652%
248
+652%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1008%
144
+1008%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−679%
109
+679%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−905%
191
+905%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−440%
254
+440%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−836%
131
+836%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−967%
64
+967%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−900%
140
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−773%
96
+773%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−727%
91
+727%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−533%
95
+533%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−488%
194
+488%
Hitman 3 10−12
−773%
96
+773%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−648%
247
+648%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−977%
140
+977%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−636%
103
+636%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−595%
130−140
+595%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−322%
75−80
+322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−419%
244
+419%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−300%
56
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−817%
55
+817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−545%
71
+545%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−536%
70
+536%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−218%
105
+218%
Hitman 3 10−12
−636%
81
+636%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−264%
120
+264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−595%
130−140
+595%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−306%
73
+306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+4.4%
45
−4.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−586%
96
+586%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−600%
55−60
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 42
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−920%
51
+920%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−600%
40−45
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1500%
200−210
+1500%
Hitman 3 9−10
−500%
54
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−642%
89
+642%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−615%
236
+615%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−722%
74
+722%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1056%
104
+1056%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−833%
28
+833%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Far Cry 5 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−750%
17
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−533%
38
+533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how HD 6990M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 548% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2060 is 97% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 620% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6990M is 4% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6990M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 67 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.25 36.68
Recency 12 July 2011 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

HD 6990M has 60% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 598.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10207 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.