Arc A770M vs Radeon HD 6990M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6990M and Arc A770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6990M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.24

Arc A770M outperforms HD 6990M by a whopping 484% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.5917.49
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBlackcombDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 July 2011 (13 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11204096
Core clock speed715 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate40.04524.8
Floating-point processing power1.602 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs56256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6990M 5.24
Arc A770M 30.62
+484%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6990M 3227
Arc A770M 37375
+1058%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6990M 15113
Arc A770M 77403
+412%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p54
−456%
300−350
+456%
Full HD59
−64.4%
97
+64.4%
1440p9−10
−533%
57
+533%
4K6−7
−550%
39
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1156%
113
+1156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1050%
65−70
+1050%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−814%
120−130
+814%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−956%
95
+956%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−682%
85−90
+682%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−560%
95−100
+560%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−485%
190−200
+485%
Hitman 3 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−403%
160−170
+403%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−877%
120−130
+877%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−564%
90−95
+564%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−674%
140−150
+674%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1050%
65−70
+1050%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−814%
120−130
+814%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−756%
77
+756%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−682%
85−90
+682%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−560%
95−100
+560%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−485%
190−200
+485%
Hitman 3 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−403%
160−170
+403%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−877%
120−130
+877%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−564%
90−95
+564%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1011%
211
+1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−361%
80−85
+361%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1050%
65−70
+1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−682%
85−90
+682%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−485%
190−200
+485%
Hitman 3 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−218%
105
+218%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−842%
179
+842%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−183%
51
+183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−564%
90−95
+564%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−670%
75−80
+670%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 40−45
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1615%
220−230
+1615%
Hitman 3 9−10
−478%
50−55
+478%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−583%
82
+583%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−488%
190−200
+488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1944%
180−190
+1944%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 22
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 74
+0%
74
+0%

This is how HD 6990M and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 456% faster in 900p
  • Arc A770M is 64% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 533% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is ahead in 68 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 30.62
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt

HD 6990M has 20% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 484.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.