GeForce Go 6150 vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and GeForce Go 6150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 6990M Crossfire outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 19400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 468 | 1487 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | no data |
| GPU code name | Blackcomb XTX | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2240 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x1700 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | shared Memory |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 99 | 0−1 |
| Full HD | 108 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+450%
|
6−7
−450%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+271%
|
24−27
−271%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+1456%
|
9−10
−1456%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+738%
|
8−9
−738%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+450%
|
6−7
−450%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+271%
|
24−27
−271%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+738%
|
8−9
−738%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+450%
|
6−7
−450%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+700%
|
3−4
−700%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+271%
|
24−27
−271%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 100−110 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50
+4700%
|
1−2
−4700%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6990M Crossfire is 4700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, HD 6990M Crossfire surpassed Go 6150 in all 30 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.75 | 0.05 |
| Recency | 12 July 2011 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 110 nm |
HD 6990M Crossfire has a 19400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
