GeForce 940MX vs Radeon HD 6970M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M and GeForce 940MX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6970M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.88
+49.6%

HD 6970M outperforms 940MX by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking585691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4511.88
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameBlackcombGM107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)28 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960512
Core clock speed680 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data861 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6427.55
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.8817 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970M 5.88
+49.6%
GeForce 940MX 3.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970M 2270
+49.5%
GeForce 940MX 1518

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6970M 2819
+10.3%
GeForce 940MX 2556

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6970M 11898
+39.2%
GeForce 940MX 8549

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
+73.3%
30−35
−73.3%
Full HD50
+194%
17
−194%
4K14−16
+40%
10
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+36.4%
11
−36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−86.8%
71
+86.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+5.3%
19
−5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+7.1%
14
−7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−7.9%
41
+7.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−57.9%
30
+57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+200%
5
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+217%
12
−217%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+227%
11
−227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+171%
7
−171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+16.7%
40−45
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how HD 6970M and GeForce 940MX compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970M is 73% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M is 194% faster in 1080p
  • HD 6970M is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6970M is 325% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce 940MX is 87% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970M is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
  • GeForce 940MX is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.88 3.93
Recency 4 January 2011 28 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

HD 6970M has a 49.6% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 940MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 226.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6970M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 940MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Radeon HD 6970M
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GeForce 940MX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2171 vote

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.