GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970M Crossfire
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5
9.02

GTX 1630 outperforms HD 6970M Crossfire by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.88
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920512
Core clock speed680 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors2x1700 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.12
Floating-point processing powerno data1.828 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p94
−38.3%
130−140
+38.3%
Full HD102
−37.3%
140−150
+37.3%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Atomic Heart 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Fortnite 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Valorant 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Atomic Heart 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−43.9%
190−200
+43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Dota 2 60−65
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Fortnite 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Valorant 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Dota 2 60−65
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−35.1%
50−55
+35.1%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Valorant 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Fortnite 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−38.5%
90−95
+38.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Valorant 95−100
−36.8%
130−140
+36.8%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Fortnite 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Atomic Heart 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Fortnite 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

This is how HD 6970M Crossfire and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 38% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1630 is 37% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.02 13.00
Recency 6 January 2011 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

GTX 1630 has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3
4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4
1307 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire or GeForce GTX 1630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.