Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon HD 6970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 550 Watt
7.34
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+271%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD 6970 by a whopping 271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking529198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency2.0955.47
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCaymanAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
Core clock speedno data1485 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate84.48129.6
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs9664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.34
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+271%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+307%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−257%
75−80
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−262%
170−180
+262%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−254%
85−90
+254%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.34 27.26
Recency 14 December 2010 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 271.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 1471.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 155 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.