P104-100 vs Radeon HD 6970

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 with P104-100, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 550 Watt
7.38

P104-100 outperforms HD 6970 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCaymanGP104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (14 years ago)12 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361920
Core clock speedno data1607 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz1733 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Wattno data
Texture fill rate84.48208.0
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS6.655 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs96120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.38
P104-100 9.44
+27.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970 2836
P104-100 3628
+27.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Elden Ring 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Dota 2 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Elden Ring 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Fortnite 40−45
−25%
55−60
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−27.1%
75−80
+27.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Valorant 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
World of Tanks 110−120
−23.9%
140−150
+23.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Dota 2 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−27.1%
75−80
+27.1%
Valorant 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Elden Ring 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
World of Tanks 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Valorant 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Elden Ring 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Fortnite 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.38 9.44
Recency 14 December 2010 12 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm

P104-100 has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P104-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970 is a desktop card while P104-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
NVIDIA P104-100
P104-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate P104-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.