GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Radeon HD 6970

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking534not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCaymanGM206
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years ago)1 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536768
Core clock speedno data1026 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate84.4857.12
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs9648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm202 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data105.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2010 1 March 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 950 Low Power has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6970 and GeForce GTX 950 Low Power. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 156 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 Low Power on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.